What It Is
MCA settlement generally involves attempting to resolve an outstanding MCA obligation for an agreed amount under negotiated terms. Rather than paying the full contractual balance, the business and the creditor may reach an agreement to resolve the obligation for a different amount.
Settlement is materially different from refinancing. Refinancing replaces an existing obligation with new financing. Settlement attempts to resolve the existing obligation itself—often through negotiation with the creditor.
How It Generally Works
The situation is assessed
The business reviews its MCA agreements, financial situation, and circumstances to understand whether settlement may be a path worth exploring.
Negotiation may occur
If settlement is pursued, negotiation with the creditor may take place to determine whether an agreement can be reached.
An agreement may be reached
If both parties agree, a written settlement agreement documents the terms. The obligation may then be resolved according to those terms.
What Problem It May Address
Settlement may be relevant when a business is unable to meet its current MCA payment obligations and refinancing is not feasible. It may be considered when:
- The business has defaulted or is near default
- The business has limited cash available but may be able to resolve the obligation
- Collection activity has begun or is anticipated
- The creditor may be willing to negotiate rather than pursue litigation
When It May Warrant Consideration
Settlement is not automatically appropriate simply because payments are high. It may warrant consideration when:
- The business cannot sustain current payments and refinancing is not available
- The business has explored modification and it was not sufficient or not agreed
- Default has occurred or is likely imminent
- The business has resources to potentially fund a resolution
Factors That May Affect Feasibility
Important Tradeoffs & Considerations
- Not all creditors will agree to settle. Settlement is not guaranteed.
- Settlement is not automatically appropriate simply because MCA payments are high. A business that can afford its payments may have other options to consider first.
- Settling an obligation may have tax or accounting implications. Businesses should consider consulting a tax professional.
- If the business is facing active litigation or court deadlines, obtaining qualified legal counsel should be a priority.
- A creditor may pursue collection or litigation even while settlement is being discussed.
- Any settlement agreement should be documented in writing and reviewed carefully before signing.
Documents That May Be Needed
- All MCA agreements
- Payment history and bank statements
- Any collection correspondence received
- Any legal documents received
- Current financial statements
- UCC search results
- Any prior modification or settlement communications
Questions to Ask Before Proceeding
- 1Is settlement appropriate for my situation, or should I consider other options first?
- 2Is the creditor willing to negotiate, and what terms might they consider?
- 3What are the potential tax or accounting consequences of settling?
- 4Are there pending legal actions or deadlines that need to be addressed?
- 5Should I obtain professional or legal review before agreeing to any settlement?
- 6Will the settlement include release of UCC filings?
How It Differs From Other Options
Settlement is distinct from refinancing (which replaces the obligation with new financing) and from payment modification (which adjusts terms on the existing obligation without reducing the balance). Settlement attempts to resolve the obligation itself—potentially for an amount different from the contractual balance.
Comparing the Major Options
A side-by-side look at how these paths differ. No option is ranked above another.
Refinance / Buyout
Replace MCA structure with longer-term, potentially more sustainable financing
- Involves new financing?
- Yes
- Replaces existing obligation?
- Yes
- Changes existing payment terms?
- Yes
- Creditor negotiation potentially involved?
- No
- Strong underwriting generally important?
- Yes
- Can default status affect feasibility?
- Yes
Qualification depends on credit, revenue, profitability, and existing MCA exposure
Learn morePayment Modification
Adjust existing payment terms without new financing or reducing balance
- Involves new financing?
- No
- Replaces existing obligation?
- No
- Changes existing payment terms?
- Yes
- Creditor negotiation potentially involved?
- Yes
- Strong underwriting generally important?
- No
- Can default status affect feasibility?
- Yes
Depends on creditor willingness; not guaranteed
Learn moreRestructuring / Workout
Reorganize multiple obligations into a manageable, stabilized payment structure
- Involves new financing?
- No
- Replaces existing obligation?
- No
- Changes existing payment terms?
- Yes
- Creditor negotiation potentially involved?
- Yes
- Strong underwriting generally important?
- No
- Can default status affect feasibility?
- Yes
Often involves coordinated negotiation across multiple creditors
Learn moreSettlement / Resolution
Resolve an obligation for an agreed amount under negotiated terms
- Involves new financing?
- No
- Replaces existing obligation?
- No
- Changes existing payment terms?
- No
- Creditor negotiation potentially involved?
- Yes
- Strong underwriting generally important?
- No
- Can default status affect feasibility?
- Yes
May involve default status, collection activity, or litigation; professional review advised
Learn moreThe appropriate path depends on the business.
Contracts and applicable law vary. Businesses facing litigation, court deadlines, or other legal issues should consider obtaining advice from qualified legal counsel. MyMCAOptions is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Related Options
Find My MCA Options
Complete a confidential evaluation to help our team understand your situation and identify which options may be worth exploring.
Find My MCA OptionsNo obligation · Confidential · Educational